Bridgestone Alenza 001 Vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV


 | 

Time To Read:

7 minutes

 | 

Time To Read:

7 minutes

Both the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV are popular choices, yet they cater to different driving needs. If you’re after a tire that can handle slick roads or are searching for superior handling and comfort, understanding their strengths and weaknesses can help you pick the best one for your ride.

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 provides better traction and handling in wet and dry conditions with a more comfortable ride. However, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is more budget-friendly and can still offer reasonable performance on dry roads for drivers seeking value.

In this article, we’ll compare the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV in various categories like wet performance, dry traction, comfort, and durability to help you decide which tire best fits your driving style and budget.

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

8.3 of 10

Wet Weather

8.3 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

7.5 of 10

Dry Weather

8.9 of 10

Ride Comfort

8.5 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 300

UTQG Traction Rating: A

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 8.3 of 10

Wet Grip: 8.3 of 10


Cornering: 8.9 of 10

Dry Grip: 9.0 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.9 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 8.5 of 10

Road Noise: 8.4 of 10

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 is like your trusty Swiss Army knife for summer tires. It’s built for versatile performance and aims to deliver a balance between sporty handling and comfortable cruising. But let’s dive into the nitty-gritty.

Key Performance Measurements

Wet Performance:

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.3
  • Wet Traction: 8.3
Solid scores here mean the Alenza 001 holds its own on wet roads. It’s not the leader of the pack, but it’s got enough grip to handle those unexpected downpours with relative ease.

Dry Performance:

  • Corner Stability: 8.9
  • Dry Traction: 9.0
  • Steering Response: 8.9
The Alenza 001 shines on dry pavement. With an impressive 9.0 for dry traction, it bites the asphalt like a determined terrier. Steering response and corner stability also get top marks, meaning tight curves and sudden maneuvers won’t leave you feeling like a cow on roller skates.

Comfort:

  • Ride Quality: 8.5
  • Noise: 8.4
For a performance tire, these scores indicate a fairly smooth, quiet ride. It won’t feel like you’re floating on a cloud, but it’s far from a rattling stagecoach. The noise level is kept to a soft hum rather than a highway howl.

Treadwear: 7.5
The tread life could be better. At 7.5, you might find yourself replacing these tires a bit sooner than you’d like if you’re a frequent road warrior. It’s not a deal-breaker, but something to consider.

Pros

  • Fantastic dry traction and stability
  • Above-average wet handling
  • Comfortable, quiet ride for a performance tire

Cons

  • Tread life may disappoint heavy drivers
  • Wet grip isn’t exceptional for aggressive cornering

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

6.9 of 10

Wet Weather

7.3 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

5.0 of 10

Dry Weather

8.1 of 10

Ride Comfort

7.3 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 240

UTQG Traction Rating: AA

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 7.1 of 10

Wet Grip: 7.6 of 10


Cornering: 8.1 of 10

Dry Grip: 8.3 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.0 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 7.5 of 10

Road Noise: 7.1 of 10

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV promises spirited driving for SUV enthusiasts who like to push the limits. It’s the high-performance cousin of your reliable family minivan tire, designed for those who want a bit of adrenaline in their commute. Let’s see how it measures up.

Key Performance Measurements

Wet Performance:

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 7.1
  • Wet Traction: 7.6
The Eagle F1 isn’t exactly soaring when the roads get slippery. With a 7.1 for hydroplaning resistance and 7.6 for wet traction, it’s not ideal for the torrential downpours or the cautious driver. This is a tire that could leave you feeling like you’re tiptoeing on the edge in wet conditions.

Dry Performance:

  • Corner Stability: 8.1
  • Dry Traction: 8.3
  • Steering Response: 8.0
Dry roads are where the Eagle F1 regains its wings. An 8.3 for dry traction is solid, and the 8.1 corner stability means you’ll be able to hug those turns without feeling like you’re at the mercy of gravity. Steering response isn’t razor-sharp, but it’s enough to keep your SUV nimble.

Comfort:

  • Ride Quality: 7.5
  • Noise: 7.1
The Eagle F1 gives you a reasonably smooth ride, though it’s not the most refined tire in terms of comfort. Expect some cabin noise as your engine hums along the highway. It’s not unbearable, but it might remind you that you’re riding on sporty rubber.

Treadwear: 5.0
This is where the Eagle F1 shows its Achilles’ heel. A treadwear score of 5.0 suggests that if you like putting the pedal to the metal, these tires could be headed to an early retirement. They’re best suited for drivers who value short-term thrills over long-term durability.

Pros

  • Reliable dry handling with stable cornering
  • Sufficient traction for spirited driving

Cons

  • Wet grip lacks confidence
  • Tread life is relatively short
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.

Comparative Analysis

When choosing between the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, understanding their specific strengths and weaknesses will help you make the best decision. Here’s a detailed comparison to guide your selection.

Performance in Wet Conditions

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Hydroplaning Resistance 8.3 7.1
Wet Traction 8.3 7.6

In wet conditions, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 clearly outperforms the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV in both hydroplaning resistance and wet traction. If you’re often driving through rainy conditions, the Alenza 001 will give you better stability and confidence.

Dry Traction and Handling

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Corner Stability 8.9 8.1
Dry Traction 9.0 8.3
Steering Response 8.9 8.0

In dry conditions, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 maintains better traction and handling than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. Its superior scores in corner stability, dry traction, and steering response make it a great choice for those who enjoy spirited driving.

Comfort and Noise

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Ride Quality 8.5 7.5
Noise 8.4 7.1

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 provides a more comfortable ride and quieter cabin than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. Its higher scores in ride quality and noise suppression make it better suited for those who value a smooth, peaceful journey.

Treadwear and Durability

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Treadwear 7.5 5.0

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 has significantly better treadwear than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, indicating a longer lifespan. With a treadwear score of 7.5 compared to Goodyear’s 5.0, you’ll get more miles before needing a replacement.

Overall Recommendation

  • Choose Bridgestone Alenza 001 if: You need reliable wet and dry performance, enhanced ride comfort, and a longer tread life. It’s ideal for drivers who demand consistent traction and handling, regardless of weather.
  • Opt for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if: You prioritize a more affordable tire and are willing to compromise on tread life and wet performance. It’s a better option for those looking for decent dry-road handling at a potentially lower price point.

Other Competitors in the Market

Beyond the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, the market offers several other contenders that shine in the Summer Performance Tire category. Here’s a closer look at some key players:

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.9
    • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.8
    • Wet Traction: 8.9
  • Dry: 9.3
    • Corner Stability: 9.3
    • Dry Traction: 9.4
    • Steering Response: 9.3
  • Comfort: 8.9
    • Ride Quality: 9.1
    • Noise: 8.8
  • Treadwear: 7.7

Pros:

  • Exceptional performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Strong traction and steering response for confident handling

Cons:

  • Slightly lower treadwear rating might necessitate replacements sooner

General Grabber UHP

General Grabber UHP
General Grabber UHP

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.7
    • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.7
    • Wet Traction: 8.8
  • Dry: 8.8
    • Corner Stability: 8.7
    • Dry Traction: 9.1
    • Steering Response: 8.7
  • Comfort: 7.9
    • Ride Quality: 8.2
    • Noise: 7.6
  • Treadwear: 7.9

Pros:

  • Solid all-around performance, especially in wet and dry conditions
  • Competitive traction and steering response at a reasonable price point

Cons:

  • Slightly lower comfort rating compared to other tires in this category

Continental CrossContact UHP

Continental CrossContact UHP
Continental CrossContact UHP

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.2
    • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.1
    • Wet Traction: 8.3
  • Dry: 8.7
    • Corner Stability: 8.5
    • Dry Traction: 8.9
    • Steering Response: 8.6
  • Comfort: 8.2
    • Ride Quality: 8.2
    • Noise: 8.2
  • Treadwear: 6.6

Pros:

  • Delivers reliable traction and stability
  • Offers decent comfort levels, with manageable noise

Cons:

  • Lower treadwear score indicates a shorter lifespan

Each of these alternatives caters to specific driving styles and needs:

  • Balanced Performance: The General Grabber UHP is an excellent option for balanced wet and dry performance without a high price tag.
  • Top Comfort: The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV provides exceptional comfort and performance, ideal for enthusiasts who prioritize smooth handling.
  • Varied Weather: The Continental CrossContact UHP ensures reliable traction and cornering for those navigating a mix of weather conditions.

Resources

Below are some links you may find helpful when learning about tires:

Final Thoughts

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV each cater to different driving needs. The Alenza 001 excels in wet and dry conditions with superior handling and a comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Eagle F1 is a solid, budget-friendly option for drivers who mostly drive on dry roads and don’t mind compromising a bit on comfort and tread life.

Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving style and needs. If you prioritize performance and comfort, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 will serve you well. However, if budget is a major factor and your SUV mostly sticks to dry pavement, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV remains a worthy consideration.

Good luck and happy motoring.

About The Author

Both the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV are popular choices, yet they cater to different driving needs. If you’re after a tire that can handle slick roads or are searching for superior handling and comfort, understanding their strengths and weaknesses can help you pick the best one for your ride.

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 provides better traction and handling in wet and dry conditions with a more comfortable ride. However, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is more budget-friendly and can still offer reasonable performance on dry roads for drivers seeking value.

In this article, we’ll compare the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV in various categories like wet performance, dry traction, comfort, and durability to help you decide which tire best fits your driving style and budget.

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

8.3 of 10

Wet Weather

8.3 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

7.5 of 10

Dry Weather

8.9 of 10

Ride Comfort

8.5 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 300

UTQG Traction Rating: A

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 8.3 of 10

Wet Grip: 8.3 of 10


Cornering: 8.9 of 10

Dry Grip: 9.0 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.9 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 8.5 of 10

Road Noise: 8.4 of 10

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 is like your trusty Swiss Army knife for summer tires. It’s built for versatile performance and aims to deliver a balance between sporty handling and comfortable cruising. But let’s dive into the nitty-gritty.

Key Performance Measurements

Wet Performance:

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.3
  • Wet Traction: 8.3
Solid scores here mean the Alenza 001 holds its own on wet roads. It’s not the leader of the pack, but it’s got enough grip to handle those unexpected downpours with relative ease.

Dry Performance:

  • Corner Stability: 8.9
  • Dry Traction: 9.0
  • Steering Response: 8.9
The Alenza 001 shines on dry pavement. With an impressive 9.0 for dry traction, it bites the asphalt like a determined terrier. Steering response and corner stability also get top marks, meaning tight curves and sudden maneuvers won’t leave you feeling like a cow on roller skates.

Comfort:

  • Ride Quality: 8.5
  • Noise: 8.4
For a performance tire, these scores indicate a fairly smooth, quiet ride. It won’t feel like you’re floating on a cloud, but it’s far from a rattling stagecoach. The noise level is kept to a soft hum rather than a highway howl.

Treadwear: 7.5
The tread life could be better. At 7.5, you might find yourself replacing these tires a bit sooner than you’d like if you’re a frequent road warrior. It’s not a deal-breaker, but something to consider.

Pros

  • Fantastic dry traction and stability
  • Above-average wet handling
  • Comfortable, quiet ride for a performance tire

Cons

  • Tread life may disappoint heavy drivers
  • Wet grip isn’t exceptional for aggressive cornering

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

6.9 of 10

Wet Weather

7.3 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

5.0 of 10

Dry Weather

8.1 of 10

Ride Comfort

7.3 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 240

UTQG Traction Rating: AA

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 7.1 of 10

Wet Grip: 7.6 of 10


Cornering: 8.1 of 10

Dry Grip: 8.3 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.0 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 7.5 of 10

Road Noise: 7.1 of 10

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV promises spirited driving for SUV enthusiasts who like to push the limits. It’s the high-performance cousin of your reliable family minivan tire, designed for those who want a bit of adrenaline in their commute. Let’s see how it measures up.

Key Performance Measurements

Wet Performance:

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 7.1
  • Wet Traction: 7.6
The Eagle F1 isn’t exactly soaring when the roads get slippery. With a 7.1 for hydroplaning resistance and 7.6 for wet traction, it’s not ideal for the torrential downpours or the cautious driver. This is a tire that could leave you feeling like you’re tiptoeing on the edge in wet conditions.

Dry Performance:

  • Corner Stability: 8.1
  • Dry Traction: 8.3
  • Steering Response: 8.0
Dry roads are where the Eagle F1 regains its wings. An 8.3 for dry traction is solid, and the 8.1 corner stability means you’ll be able to hug those turns without feeling like you’re at the mercy of gravity. Steering response isn’t razor-sharp, but it’s enough to keep your SUV nimble.

Comfort:

  • Ride Quality: 7.5
  • Noise: 7.1
The Eagle F1 gives you a reasonably smooth ride, though it’s not the most refined tire in terms of comfort. Expect some cabin noise as your engine hums along the highway. It’s not unbearable, but it might remind you that you’re riding on sporty rubber.

Treadwear: 5.0
This is where the Eagle F1 shows its Achilles’ heel. A treadwear score of 5.0 suggests that if you like putting the pedal to the metal, these tires could be headed to an early retirement. They’re best suited for drivers who value short-term thrills over long-term durability.

Pros

  • Reliable dry handling with stable cornering
  • Sufficient traction for spirited driving

Cons

  • Wet grip lacks confidence
  • Tread life is relatively short
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.

Comparative Analysis

When choosing between the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, understanding their specific strengths and weaknesses will help you make the best decision. Here’s a detailed comparison to guide your selection.

Performance in Wet Conditions

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Hydroplaning Resistance 8.3 7.1
Wet Traction 8.3 7.6

In wet conditions, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 clearly outperforms the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV in both hydroplaning resistance and wet traction. If you’re often driving through rainy conditions, the Alenza 001 will give you better stability and confidence.

Dry Traction and Handling

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Corner Stability 8.9 8.1
Dry Traction 9.0 8.3
Steering Response 8.9 8.0

In dry conditions, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 maintains better traction and handling than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. Its superior scores in corner stability, dry traction, and steering response make it a great choice for those who enjoy spirited driving.

Comfort and Noise

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Ride Quality 8.5 7.5
Noise 8.4 7.1

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 provides a more comfortable ride and quieter cabin than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV. Its higher scores in ride quality and noise suppression make it better suited for those who value a smooth, peaceful journey.

Treadwear and Durability

Bridgestone Alenza 001 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Treadwear 7.5 5.0

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 has significantly better treadwear than the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, indicating a longer lifespan. With a treadwear score of 7.5 compared to Goodyear’s 5.0, you’ll get more miles before needing a replacement.

Overall Recommendation

  • Choose Bridgestone Alenza 001 if: You need reliable wet and dry performance, enhanced ride comfort, and a longer tread life. It’s ideal for drivers who demand consistent traction and handling, regardless of weather.
  • Opt for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if: You prioritize a more affordable tire and are willing to compromise on tread life and wet performance. It’s a better option for those looking for decent dry-road handling at a potentially lower price point.

Other Competitors in the Market

Beyond the Bridgestone Alenza 001 and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, the market offers several other contenders that shine in the Summer Performance Tire category. Here’s a closer look at some key players:

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.9
    • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.8
    • Wet Traction: 8.9
  • Dry: 9.3
    • Corner Stability: 9.3
    • Dry Traction: 9.4
    • Steering Response: 9.3
  • Comfort: 8.9
    • Ride Quality: 9.1
    • Noise: 8.8
  • Treadwear: 7.7

Pros:

  • Exceptional performance in both wet and dry conditions
  • Strong traction and steering response for confident handling

Cons:

  • Slightly lower treadwear rating might necessitate replacements sooner

General Grabber UHP

General Grabber UHP
General Grabber UHP

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.7
    • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.7
    • Wet Traction: 8.8
  • Dry: 8.8
    • Corner Stability: 8.7
    • Dry Traction: 9.1
    • Steering Response: 8.7
  • Comfort: 7.9
    • Ride Quality: 8.2
    • Noise: 7.6
  • Treadwear: 7.9

Pros:

  • Solid all-around performance, especially in wet and dry conditions
  • Competitive traction and steering response at a reasonable price point

Cons:

  • Slightly lower comfort rating compared to other tires in this category

Continental CrossContact UHP

Continental CrossContact UHP
Continental CrossContact UHP

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.2
    • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.1
    • Wet Traction: 8.3
  • Dry: 8.7
    • Corner Stability: 8.5
    • Dry Traction: 8.9
    • Steering Response: 8.6
  • Comfort: 8.2
    • Ride Quality: 8.2
    • Noise: 8.2
  • Treadwear: 6.6

Pros:

  • Delivers reliable traction and stability
  • Offers decent comfort levels, with manageable noise

Cons:

  • Lower treadwear score indicates a shorter lifespan

Each of these alternatives caters to specific driving styles and needs:

  • Balanced Performance: The General Grabber UHP is an excellent option for balanced wet and dry performance without a high price tag.
  • Top Comfort: The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV provides exceptional comfort and performance, ideal for enthusiasts who prioritize smooth handling.
  • Varied Weather: The Continental CrossContact UHP ensures reliable traction and cornering for those navigating a mix of weather conditions.

Resources

Below are some links you may find helpful when learning about tires:

Final Thoughts

The Bridgestone Alenza 001 and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV each cater to different driving needs. The Alenza 001 excels in wet and dry conditions with superior handling and a comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Eagle F1 is a solid, budget-friendly option for drivers who mostly drive on dry roads and don’t mind compromising a bit on comfort and tread life.

Ultimately, the right choice depends on your driving style and needs. If you prioritize performance and comfort, the Bridgestone Alenza 001 will serve you well. However, if budget is a major factor and your SUV mostly sticks to dry pavement, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV remains a worthy consideration.

Good luck and happy motoring.



About The Author