The General Grabber UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric are both high-performance options, but their differences in handling, traction, and comfort could sway your decision one way or the other.
The General Grabber UHP outperforms the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV in wet conditions, treadwear, and overall handling, offering a more balanced and durable performance.
In this article, you’ll find a breakdown of the strengths and weaknesses of the General Grabber UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, along with comparisons to other competitive tires. We’ll also provide recommendations to help you choose the best fit for your driving style and needs.
General Grabber UHP
Customer Rating
Overall Rating
8.3 of 10
Wet Weather
8.7 of 10
Winter Weather
N/A
Tread Wear
7.9 of 10
Dry Weather
8.8 of 10
Ride Comfort
7.9 of 10
UTQG
Uniform Tire Quality Grade
UTQG Treadwear Rating: 320
UTQG Traction Rating: A
UTQG Temperature Rating: A
Mileage Warranty
None
Find The Best Price
Key Performance Metrics
Hydroplaning: 8.7 of 10
Wet Grip: 8.8 of 10
Cornering: 8.7 of 10
Dry Grip: 9.1 of 10
Responsiveness: 8.7 of 10
Mild Snow Grip: N/A
Heavy Snow Grip: N/A
Ice Grip: N/A
Comfort Level: 8.2 of 10
Road Noise: 7.6 of 10
If you’re the kind of driver who likes to make the most of every mile while balancing performance and comfort, the General Grabber UHP might just catch your eye. This tire promises an all-around, satisfying drive, excelling particularly in wet and dry conditions.
Wet Performance: 8.7
- Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.7
- Wet Traction: 8.8
In the wet, the Grabber UHP grips like it’s got something to prove, with hydroplaning resistance that helps keep you steady through those sudden downpours. It doesn’t stop there, either—wet traction is a strong suit, keeping your SUV planted even on slick roads.
Dry Performance: 8.8
- Corner Stability: 8.7
- Dry Traction: 9.1
- Steering Response: 8.7
On dry pavement, this tire shines with excellent dry traction, making cornering smooth as butter. It grabs the road tightly and offers responsive steering to help you feel connected to the drive.
Comfort: 7.9
- Ride Quality: 8.2
- Noise: 7.6
Comfort is respectable, though road noise could be a touch quieter. It cushions your ride adequately without feeling too floaty.
Treadwear: 7.9
Durability is solid, meaning you won’t have to shell out for replacements as quickly. It’s not Michelin-tier, but it’s a good bang for your buck.
Pros
- Excellent wet and dry performance
- Great balance of corner stability and traction
- Reliable tread life
Cons
- Noise levels could be improved
- Ride comfort isn’t luxury-grade
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Customer Rating
Overall Rating
6.9 of 10
Wet Weather
7.3 of 10
Winter Weather
N/A
Tread Wear
5.0 of 10
Dry Weather
8.1 of 10
Ride Comfort
7.3 of 10
UTQG
Uniform Tire Quality Grade
UTQG Treadwear Rating: 240
UTQG Traction Rating: AA
UTQG Temperature Rating: A
Mileage Warranty
None
Find The Best Price
Key Performance Metrics
Hydroplaning: 7.1 of 10
Wet Grip: 7.6 of 10
Cornering: 8.1 of 10
Dry Grip: 8.3 of 10
Responsiveness: 8.0 of 10
Mild Snow Grip: N/A
Heavy Snow Grip: N/A
Ice Grip: N/A
Comfort Level: 7.5 of 10
Road Noise: 7.1 of 10
The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV, while not exceptional in every category, brings a sporty spirit and solid dry handling to the table. It’s a good tire for drivers who want dependable cornering and steering response but should be mindful of its weaker wet performance and shorter treadwear when compared to the General Grabber UHP.
Wet Performance: 7.3
- Hydroplaning Resistance: 7.1
- Wet Traction: 7.6
Wet conditions are not where the Eagle F1 excels. Hydroplaning resistance lags behind the competition, and wet traction leaves something to be desired. It still holds its own, but it isn’t the best for rainy climates.
Dry Performance: 8.1
- Corner Stability: 8.1
- Dry Traction: 8.3
- Steering Response: 8.0
Dry roads are where this tire sings. It’s got solid cornering stability and responsive steering, giving your SUV a confident, sporty feel on tight bends and long straights alike.
Comfort: 7.3
- Ride Quality: 7.5
- Noise: 7.1
Here, the Eagle F1 struggles a bit. Ride quality is passable, but road noise can be a bother on longer journeys. It’s not unbearable, but it might make you think twice if you value a quiet cabin.
Treadwear: 5.0
Treadwear is a glaring weakness for this model. The aggressive tread pattern that makes it so fun to drive also means you’ll likely be swapping these out sooner rather than later.
Pros
- Strong dry performance, especially in cornering
- Responsive steering and sporty feel
Cons
- Wet performance could be better
- Road noise can be intrusive
- Short tread life
Comparative Analysis
Choosing the right tire boils down to matching strengths and weaknesses to your driving style. The General Grabber UHP and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV each have their own mix of pros and cons, appealing to different priorities and needs. Here’s a side-by-side comparison to make that decision a little easier.
Performance in Wet Conditions
| General Grabber UHP | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Hydroplaning Resistance | 8.7 | 7.1 |
| Wet Traction | 8.8 | 7.6 |
In the wet, the General Grabber UHP performs better overall with higher scores in hydroplaning resistance and wet traction. It’s a safer bet if your climate sees a lot of rain, giving you more confidence on slick roads.
Dry Traction and Handling
| General Grabber UHP | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Corner Stability | 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Dry Traction | 9.1 | 8.3 |
| Steering Response | 8.7 | 8.0 |
On dry pavement, the General Grabber UHP wins again, especially in dry traction. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is still sporty, but the Grabber UHP feels tighter around corners and responds to steering with a sharper edge.
Comfort and Noise
| General Grabber UHP | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Ride Quality | 8.2 | 7.5 |
| Noise | 7.6 | 7.1 |
In terms of ride comfort, the General Grabber UHP edges ahead, providing a smoother journey with slightly less road noise. However, both could stand to be a bit quieter for longer drives.
Treadwear and Durability
| General Grabber UHP | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV | |
|---|---|---|
| Treadwear | 7.9 | 5.0 |
The General Grabber UHP’s treadwear score of 7.9 easily beats the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV’s 5.0. The Goodyear’s sportier tread design sacrifices durability, so the Grabber UHP is the smarter choice if you’re looking for tires with longer-lasting performance.
The Verdict
- Choose General Grabber UHP if: You want a reliable performer in both wet and dry conditions with better treadwear and a quieter ride. It’s ideal for drivers who need tires that handle rain with confidence while offering a balance of comfort and durability.
- Opt for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if: You love that sporty feel on dry roads and don’t mind swapping out tires more frequently. Its cornering stability and steering response will make driving a bit more engaging if wet performance and longevity aren’t top priorities.
Other Competitors in the Market
While the General Grabber UHP and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV have their own merits, the world of tires is vast, and other models bring their own flavor to the performance game. Let’s check out the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, Bridgestone Alenza 001, and Continental CrossContact UHP to see how they compare.
MICHELIN PILOT SPORT 4 SUV
Performance Ratings:
- Wet: 8.9
- Dry: 9.3
- Comfort: 8.9
- Treadwear: 7.7
Pros:
- Stellar traction and handling in wet and dry conditions
- Smooth ride quality and reduced road noise
Cons:
- Slightly lower treadwear, meaning it may not last as long as some other options
Ideal Usage:
This tire is perfect for those who want a luxurious driving experience in varying weather conditions. It’s an exceptional choice for drivers who value performance above all else and don’t mind a premium price tag.
Bridgestone Alenza 001
Performance Ratings:
- Wet: 8.3
- Dry: 8.9
- Comfort: 8.5
- Treadwear: 7.5
Pros:
- Strong dry performance, especially in traction and stability
- Smooth ride quality
Cons:
- Wet traction isn’t stellar
- Treadwear is on the lower end, meaning a shorter lifespan
Ideal Usage:
The Bridgestone Alenza 001 is best for drivers who primarily drive in dry conditions and prioritize handling, comfort, and stability. It’s great for long road trips, offering a cushioned ride that makes each mile a bit more pleasant.
Continental CrossContact UHP
Performance Ratings:
- Wet: 8.2
- Dry: 8.7
- Comfort: 8.2
- Treadwear: 6.6
Pros:
- Good balance between wet and dry performance
- Smooth and quiet ride
Cons:
- Lower treadwear score suggests a shorter lifespan
Ideal Usage:
The Continental CrossContact UHP is great for drivers looking for a well-rounded performer at a reasonable price. It’s reliable for mixed weather conditions but may require more frequent replacements if you rack up the miles quickly.
- For Balanced Value and Performance: Go for the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV if you’re willing to invest a bit more for standout performance and superior comfort.
- For Comfort on Long Drives: The Bridgestone Alenza 001 prioritizes comfort and handling, making it ideal for family trips and those seeking a softer, quieter ride.
- For Budget-Friendly Options: The Continental CrossContact UHP combines value and versatility, offering decent performance without breaking the bank.
Resources
Below are some links you may find helpful when learning about tires:
- General Product Page
- Goodyear Product Page
- Street/sport truck summer performance tire consumer ratings – Tire Rack
Final Thoughts
The General Grabber UHP offers better wet handling, treadwear, and overall value, making it ideal for drivers who prioritize balanced performance and longer tread life. On the other hand, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV shines on dry roads with its sporty responsiveness and cornering, perfect for those seeking a spirited drive and are less concerned about treadwear.
Ultimately, choosing between the two tires depends on your typical road conditions and driving preferences. Both tires deliver unique advantages, so weigh the pros and cons carefully to see which fits your needs.
Good luck and happy motoring.
