Deciding on the right winter tires isn’t just about choosing between two brands — it’s about understanding the significant differences in how they perform under various winter conditions. Whether you’re bracing for slushy streets or icy roads, knowing these differences can greatly affect your driving experience.
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 excels on ice and deep snow, making it ideal for harsh winter climates, whereas the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 offers better performance on both wet and dry roads, suitable for milder winter conditions with varied weather.
In this article, we’ll delve deep into the pros and cons of both the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 and the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, compare their performance under different conditions, and introduce you to some competitive alternatives in the winter tire market.
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3
Customer Rating
Overall Rating
8.4 of 10
Wet Weather
8.8 of 10
Winter Weather
9.4 of 10
Tread Wear
8.0 of 10
Dry Weather
7.1 of 10
Ride Comfort
8.8 of 10
UTQG
Uniform Tire Quality Grade
UTQG Treadwear Rating: N/A
UTQG Traction Rating: N/A
UTQG Temperature Rating: N/A
Mileage Warranty
None
Find The Best Price
Key Performance Metrics
Hydroplaning: 9.5 of 10
Wet Grip: 8.0 of 10
Cornering: 7.0 of 10
Dry Grip: 7.2 of 10
Responsiveness: 7.1 of 10
Mild Snow Grip: 9.8
Heavy Snow Grip: 9.5
Ice Grip: 9.0
Comfort Level: 9.0 of 10
Road Noise: 8.5 of 10
When the snow starts to fall, and the roads get slippery, you want to know that your tires can handle the challenge. Enter the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3, a tire designed specifically for the harshest winter conditions. Let’s break down what makes this tire a solid choice for winter warriors, and where it might leave you wanting more.
Performance Breakdown
- Wet Conditions: With a score of 8.8 overall, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 shines in hydroplaning resistance at a remarkable 9.5, ensuring that water and slush won’t keep you from your destination. However, its wet traction is a bit lower at 8.0, meaning it could struggle slightly on just wet, unfrozen roads.
- Dry Conditions: Scoring 7.1 overall in dry conditions, this tire shows some limitations. With corner stability and dry traction scoring 7.0 and 7.2 respectively, it’s clear that dry performance is not its forte. Steering response is also on the lower end at 7.1, suggesting a less crisp feel on clear roads.
- Winter/Snow: This is where the R3 truly excels, boasting a score of 9.4. It provides top-notch light snow traction at 9.8 and impressive deep snow traction at 9.5. Its ice traction score of 9.0 means it holds its own on icy surfaces, making it a reliable partner in winter driving.
- Comfort: Rated at 8.8, it offers a smooth ride (9.0) and moderate noise levels (8.5), making it a comfortable option for long winter trips.
- Treadwear: The tire’s treadwear score is 8.0, suggesting it wears reasonably well but might not be the longest-lasting tire you can buy.
Pros
- Excellent in snow and ice, ensuring safety in severe winter conditions.
- High hydroplaning resistance for slushy environments.
- Comfortable ride quality makes it easier on long drives.
Cons
- Not as adept on dry roads, with lower scores in dry traction and steering.
- Moderate tread life suggests a possible need for more frequent replacement compared to some rivals.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90
Customer Rating
Overall Rating
8.8 of 10
Wet Weather
9.1 of 10
Winter Weather
9.2 of 10
Tread Wear
8.4 of 10
Dry Weather
8.8 of 10
Ride Comfort
8.5 of 10
UTQG
Uniform Tire Quality Grade
UTQG Treadwear Rating: N/A
UTQG Traction Rating: N/A
UTQG Temperature Rating: N/A
Mileage Warranty
None
Find The Best Price
Key Performance Metrics
Hydroplaning: 9.1 of 10
Wet Grip: 9.1 of 10
Cornering: 8.7 of 10
Dry Grip: 9.0 of 10
Responsiveness: 8.7 of 10
Mild Snow Grip: 9.6
Heavy Snow Grip: 9.3
Ice Grip: 8.9
Comfort Level: 8.9 of 10
Road Noise: 8.2 of 10
As winter conditions begin to take hold, the right tires can make all the difference between a stressful journey and a secure, controlled drive. The Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 is often a go-to choice for drivers seeking dependable winter performance. Let’s explore the attributes of this tire to see why it’s favored by many, along with some areas where it may not meet everyone’s needs.
Performance Breakdown
- Wet Conditions: The Blizzak WS90 achieves a solid 9.1 in wet performance, equally divided between hydroplaning resistance and wet traction. This score reflects its ability to maintain grip and stability in rainy or slushy conditions, a crucial factor for winter driving.
- Dry Conditions: With an overall score of 8.8 in dry conditions, the WS90 performs robustly. It offers corner stability and dry traction scores of 8.7, and a steering response of 8.9, indicating good control and responsiveness on dry roads — important for those clear but cold winter days.
- Winter/Snow: Excelling in winter performance, it scores 9.2, showcasing strong capabilities in light snow (9.6) and deep snow (9.3), with a slightly lower but still impressive ice traction score of 8.9. These numbers speak to its reliability in the kinds of conditions that would keep lesser tires locked in the garage.
- Comfort: Rated at 8.5 for comfort, the WS90 provides a ride quality of 8.9, ensuring a smoother journey even on rough winter roads. However, its noise level at 8.2 suggests it might be a bit noisier compared to some competitors, which could be a minor annoyance on long trips.
- Treadwear: The treadwear rating stands at 8.4, indicating decent durability and a reasonable lifespan for a winter tire, balancing performance with wear life effectively.
Pros
- Excellent wet and snow performance ensures control and safety in severe winter conditions.
- Good dry condition handling means it’s also a strong performer on those clear, cold days.
- High comfort level enhances the driving experience, especially on longer journeys.
Cons
- Noise level is slightly higher, which might not be ideal for those who value a quieter ride.
- While treadwear is decent, there are other tires in the market that may offer longer wear.
Comparative Analysis
When choosing between the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 and the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90, the decision largely hinges on specific driving conditions and priorities. Here, we’ll lay out a head-to-head comparison to help clarify which tire might best suit your winter driving needs.
Performance in Winter Conditions
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3:
- Exceptional in snow and ice, scoring 9.4 in winter conditions.
- Best-in-class light snow traction (9.8) and very strong deep snow traction (9.5).
- Solid ice traction score (9.0).
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90:
- Also excellent in winter conditions with an overall score of 9.2.
- Slightly better performance on ice (8.9) compared to many competitors, but slightly lower than the R3.
- Impressive light snow (9.6) and deep snow traction (9.3).
Key Takeaway: Both tires excel in winter conditions, but the Hakkapeliitta R3 has a slight edge in ice traction, making it potentially more reliable in icier environments.
Wet and Dry Performance
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3:
- Strong hydroplaning resistance (9.5) but lower wet traction (8.0).
- Underperforms in dry conditions with an overall score of 7.1, indicating reduced performance on clear, dry roads.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90:
- Consistently good in wet conditions (9.1 for both hydroplaning resistance and wet traction).
- Better performance on dry roads with scores around 8.7 to 8.9, indicating more stability and responsiveness when it’s not snowy.
Key Takeaway: If you frequently face wet winters or live in an area with a mix of winter and dry cold conditions, the Blizzak WS90 offers more balanced performance across different weather types.
Comfort and Treadwear
Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3:
- Comfortable ride with a rating of 8.8.
- Treadwear is a bit lower at 8.0, which might suggest a shorter lifespan compared to some competitors.
Bridgestone Blizzak WS90:
- Comfort rating slightly lower at 8.5 but still provides a smooth ride with higher noise levels (8.2).
- Better treadwear rating at 8.4, indicating a potentially longer tire life.
Key Takeaway: The Blizzak WS90 may offer a better long-term investment due to its slightly superior treadwear rating, although it might be noisier. The R3, however, could provide a more silent and smooth ride.
The Verdict
Choosing between the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 and the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 largely depends on your specific needs:
- Opt for the Hakkapeliitta R3 if you prioritize top-notch performance in severe snow and icy conditions, especially if you’re in a region where ice and deep snow are common.
- Choose the Blizzak WS90 if you need a tire that performs well across a variety of conditions, including wet roads and dry cold days, and offers a bit more durability.
Other Competitors in the Market
While the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 and the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 are standout choices in the winter tire market, there are several other competitors worth considering. Each offers unique features and benefits that may suit different driving needs and preferences. Here’s a look at some notable alternatives.
Michelin X-Ice Snow
- Performance: The Michelin X-Ice Snow scores well in winter/snow conditions with a 9.0 overall, including 9.3 for light snow traction and 9.0 for deep snow traction. Its ice traction score of 8.7 is commendable but slightly lower than the Hakkapeliitta R3.
- Wet and Dry: Performs reliably in wet conditions with an 8.8 overall and has solid scores in dry performance at 8.7.
- Comfort and Treadwear: Comfort is a strong point at 8.8, and it also boasts a treadwear rating of 8.8, suggesting good durability.
Key Takeaway: A balanced option for those who face a variety of winter conditions and prioritize longevity and comfort.
Continental VikingContact 7
- Performance: Scores 8.8 in winter/snow conditions, slightly lower than the Michelin and the two main competitors but still strong in light snow (9.2).
- Wet and Dry: Consistent scores in wet and dry conditions (8.7 and 8.6, respectively), making it a versatile winter tire.
- Comfort and Treadwear: Excellent comfort rating of 8.9 and a moderate treadwear rating of 8.5.
Key Takeaway: Ideal for drivers who prioritize comfort and solid performance across various winter scenarios.
Goodyear WinterCommand Ultra
- Performance: Has an overall winter/snow rating of 8.9, with a notable light snow traction of 9.3. However, its ice traction at 8.7 is on par with the Michelin but below the Hakkapeliitta R3.
- Wet and Dry: Good performance in wet conditions at 8.9 and satisfactory in dry conditions at 8.7.
- Comfort and Treadwear: Comfort rated at 8.5 and treadwear at 8.4, suggesting a balance between comfort and durability.
Key Takeaway: A strong choice for those who encounter a lot of light snow and value a blend of wet and dry performance.
Each of these competitors brings something different to the table, from the Michelin X-Ice Snow’s balance of performance and durability to the Pirelli Winter Cinturato’s exceptional wet handling and tread life. Depending on your specific winter driving conditions and vehicle requirements, these tires can provide viable alternatives to the Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 and Bridgestone Blizzak WS90.
Resources
Below are some links you may find helpful when learning about tires:
Final Thoughts
Choosing the right winter tire involves more than just picking a brand; it requires understanding how each tire’s characteristics align with your local weather conditions. The Nokian Hakkapeliitta R3 is your best bet for extreme winter conditions, offering superior grip and safety on ice and snow. On the other hand, the Bridgestone Blizzak WS90 provides excellent performance in a broader range of winter conditions, from wet to snowy roads, making it a more versatile choice. Evaluate your typical winter driving conditions and choose a tire that best meets those demands.
Good luck and happy motoring.
