Continental CrossContact UHP Vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Continental CrossContact UHP Vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV


 | 

Time To Read:

8 minutes

 | 

Time To Read:

8 minutes

Trying to pick between the Continental CrossContact UHP and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV can feel like deciding between apples and oranges. You’re likely here because you’re not just looking for performance comparisons—you want a clear verdict on which tire suits your driving style.

The Continental CrossContact UHP provides superior dry performance and balanced comfort, making it better for drivers prioritizing handling and smooth rides. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV offers cornering stability and reasonable dry traction at a more affordable price but wears down quicker.

In this article, we’ll compare the Continental CrossContact UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV based on their strengths and weaknesses in wet and dry conditions, treadwear, comfort, and value. We’ll also offer insights into other competitive tires to help you find the perfect match.

Continental CrossContact UHP

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

7.9 of 10

Wet Weather

8.2 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

6.6 of 10

Dry Weather

8.7 of 10

Ride Comfort

8.2 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 420

UTQG Traction Rating: A

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 8.1 of 10

Wet Grip: 8.3 of 10


Cornering: 8.5 of 10

Dry Grip: 8.9 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.6 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 8.2 of 10

Road Noise: 8.2 of 10

The Continental CrossContact UHP is designed to blend sporty summer performance with all-season versatility for SUV owners. It delivers robust dry road capabilities along with respectable wet traction that make it a well-rounded choice. Let’s look at the details:

KEY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

Wet Performance

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.1
  • Wet Traction: 8.3

For a max performance summer tire, the CrossContact UHP puts in a very solid showing in the wet. An 8.1 hydroplaning resistance rating indicates it can effectively disperse standing water. And the 8.3 wet traction score means you can drive with confidence when the roads are slick.

Dry Performance

  • Corner Stability: 8.5
  • Dry Traction: 8.9
  • Steering Response: 8.6

Dry road grip and handling are highlights. The 8.9 dry traction allows hard acceleration out of corners with excellent bite. An 8.5 corner stability rating enables high-speed turns and transitions. Steering response at 8.6 is precise and responsive.

Comfort

  • Ride Quality: 8.2
  • Noise: 8.2

You get a nice balance of performance and comfort with the CrossContact UHP. Ride quality and interior noise levels both rate a very agreeable 8.2 – firm but well-damped over bumps with minimal road noise intrusion.

Tire Life

  • Treadwear: 6.6

While not a class-leading number, a 6.6 treadwear rating is actually fairly typical for a high-performance summer tire built to maximize grip over longevity. But frequent drivers should factor in earlier replacements than some touring tires.

PROS

  • Outstanding dry traction and cornering stability
  • Balanced with high comfort levels
  • Excellent hydroplane resistance in wet conditions

CONS

  • Good but not elite wet traction compared to some rivals
  • Treadlife could be better for high mileage use

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

6.9 of 10

Wet Weather

7.3 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

5.0 of 10

Dry Weather

8.1 of 10

Ride Comfort

7.3 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 240

UTQG Traction Rating: AA

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 7.1 of 10

Wet Grip: 7.6 of 10


Cornering: 8.1 of 10

Dry Grip: 8.3 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.0 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 7.5 of 10

Road Noise: 7.1 of 10

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is a summer tire designed to bring racetrack-inspired dry road performance to your premium SUV. While it excels in grip and handling on dry pavement, it makes some trade-offs in other areas that are important to consider. Let’s dive in:

KEY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

Wet Performance

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 7.1
  • Wet Traction: 7.6

The wet ratings are a step behind the category leaders, but not necessarily underwhelming for a max performance summer tire. A 7.1 hydroplaning resistance means you’ll want to exercise some caution when there’s heavy standing water. And the 7.6 wet traction indicates respectable but not exceptional grip around soaked corners.

Dry Performance

  • Corner Stability: 8.1
  • Dry Traction: 8.3
  • Steering Response: 8.0

This is where the Eagle F1 really shows its strengths. Dry traction of 8.3 delivers reassuring straight-line acceleration and braking bite. An 8.1 corner stability rating allows for composed turn-in at speed. While steering feel rates 8.0 – good but not razor-sharp.

Comfort

  • Ride Quality: 7.5
  • Noise: 7.1

You’ll feel more of the road’s imperfections compared to some touring tires, with a 7.5 ride quality score. The 7.1 noise rating also indicates this isn’t the quietest cruiser. But it shouldn’t be punishingly harsh for a max performance tire.

Tire Life

  • Treadwear: 5.0

As is common for summer performance tires designed for exceptional grip, the 5.0 treadwear rating is on the lower side. You’re trading some longevity for race-inspired capabilities. More frequent replacements should be budgeted for high mileage drivers.

PROS

  • Superb dry road grip and handling
  • Precise performance at higher speeds
  • Responsive acceleration and braking

CONS

  • Relatively low treadwear longevity
  • Good but not elite wet traction
  • Stiffer ride compared to touring tires
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.

Comparative Analysis

When it comes to selecting the right summer tire for your SUV, the details make all the difference. Both the Continental CrossContact UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV bring capable performance features to the table, but their strengths cater to slightly different driving styles and priorities. Let’s break it down to help you decide which tire might be the perfect fit.

Performance in Wet Conditions

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Hydroplaning Resistance 8.1 7.1
Wet Traction 8.3 7.6

The Continental holds a clear advantage in wet weather performance with scores of 8.1 for hydroplaning resistance and 8.3 for wet traction, compared to 7.1 and 7.6 for the Goodyear. If you frequently encounter heavy rain or prioritize maximum traction in slick conditions, the CrossContact UHP is the safer bet.

Dry Traction and Handling

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Corner Stability 8.5 8.1
Dry Traction 8.9 8.3
Steering Response 8.6 8.0

In the dry, the CrossContact UHP again takes the lead with better ratings across the board – 8.9 dry traction compared to 8.3, along with higher scores for corner stability and steering response. If straight-line acceleration and high-speed confidence are priorities, Continental has the edge.

Comfort and Noise

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Ride Quality 8.2 7.5
Noise 8.2 7.1

The Continental CrossContact UHP provides a more comfortable and quieter ride as well, scoring 8.2 for both ride quality and noise versus 7.5 and 7.1 for the Goodyear. Long highway stints and daily commutes will likely be more pleasant on the Continentals.

Treadwear and Durability

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Treadwear 6.6 5.0

This is one area where the Goodyear falls well behind – its abysmal 5.0 treadwear rating means you’ll likely be replacing these tires far more frequently than the Continentals, which rate 6.6. For drivers looking to maximize the lifespan of their tires, the CrossContact UHP is the better value proposition.

OVERALL RECOMMENDATION

  • Choose Continental CrossContact UHP if: You want well-rounded performance that doesn’t sacrifice too much in any one area. The CrossContact UHP provides capable grip in dry and wet conditions, reasonably high comfort levels, and better projected tread life than the Goodyear. It’s a safe all-season option for drivers who want a sporty yet refined experience.
  • Opt for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if: You prioritize maximum dry road performance and don’t mind sacrificing some wet traction, ride comfort, and treadwear in exchange for higher dry grip ratings. This tire is best suited for drivers who see mostly dry conditions and really want to unlock their SUV’s sporting potential on the street or track.

The CrossContact UHP emerges as the more versatile pick for mixed driving scenarios. But for a dry-road special with incredible handling chops, the focused nature of the Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV could make it worthwhile for driving enthusiasts despite some trade-offs.

Ultimately, your decision should weigh your priorities in performance, comfort, value, and driving conditions. Both tires have strengths, but understanding how they align with your needs will help ensure you make the right choice.

Other Competitors in the Market

While the Continental CrossContact UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV stand their ground, other competitors could offer a better fit depending on your driving needs. Here’s a closer look at a few worthy contenders:

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.9 (Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.8, Wet Traction: 8.9)
  • Dry: 9.3 (Corner Stability: 9.3, Dry Traction: 9.4, Steering Response: 9.3)
  • Comfort: 8.9 (Ride Quality: 9.1, Noise: 8.8)
    Treadwear: 7.7

Pros:

  • Exceptional dry traction and stability.
  • Top-notch ride quality with minimal road noise.

Cons:

  • Average treadwear, which means a moderately shorter lifespan.

General Grabber UHP

General Grabber UHP
General Grabber UHP

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.7 (Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.7, Wet Traction: 8.8)
  • Dry: 8.8 (Corner Stability: 8.7, Dry Traction: 9.1, Steering Response: 8.7)
  • Comfort: 7.9 (Ride Quality: 8.2, Noise: 7.6)
    Treadwear: 7.9

Pros:

  • Reliable performance in both wet and dry conditions.
  • Solid traction and handling at an attractive price.

Cons:

  • Comfort rating is lower, particularly due to road noise.

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Bridgestone Alenza 001
Bridgestone Alenza 001

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.3 (Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.3, Wet Traction: 8.3)
  • Dry: 8.9 (Corner Stability: 8.9, Dry Traction: 9.0, Steering Response: 8.9)
  • Comfort: 8.5 (Ride Quality: 8.5, Noise: 8.4)
    Treadwear: 7.5

Pros:

  • Reliable grip and stability on dry pavement.
  • Comfortable ride, with a focus on reducing noise levels.

Cons:

  • Not as strong in wet conditions, and treadwear could be longer-lasting.

Each of these alternatives has its own set of strengths, catering to different needs:

  • Balanced Value: General Grabber UHP is solid for versatile performance without breaking the bank.
  • Comfort and Stability: Bridgestone Alenza 001 is ideal for smooth road trips where noise reduction is key.
  • Dry Performance Master: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV excels in delivering an unmatched dry grip and ride quality.

Make your choice wisely based on what suits your driving style, budget, and specific needs.

Resources

Below are some links you may find helpful when learning about tires:

Final Thoughts

The Continental CrossContact UHP shines in dry grip, ride quality, and steering response but has a lower treadwear rating. It’s a great pick if you want excellent performance in dry conditions with a smooth, comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV offers strong cornering stability and reasonable dry traction at a more attractive price, though it’s not as strong in wet conditions and requires more frequent replacements.

Ultimately, the choice hinges on your driving style and climate. If you value precise handling and a quieter ride, go for the CrossContact UHP. If budget matters more and you’re okay with a little extra road noise, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV might be your answer.

Good luck and happy motoring.

About The Author

Trying to pick between the Continental CrossContact UHP and the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV can feel like deciding between apples and oranges. You’re likely here because you’re not just looking for performance comparisons—you want a clear verdict on which tire suits your driving style.

The Continental CrossContact UHP provides superior dry performance and balanced comfort, making it better for drivers prioritizing handling and smooth rides. The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV offers cornering stability and reasonable dry traction at a more affordable price but wears down quicker.

In this article, we’ll compare the Continental CrossContact UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV based on their strengths and weaknesses in wet and dry conditions, treadwear, comfort, and value. We’ll also offer insights into other competitive tires to help you find the perfect match.

Continental CrossContact UHP

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

7.9 of 10

Wet Weather

8.2 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

6.6 of 10

Dry Weather

8.7 of 10

Ride Comfort

8.2 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 420

UTQG Traction Rating: A

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 8.1 of 10

Wet Grip: 8.3 of 10


Cornering: 8.5 of 10

Dry Grip: 8.9 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.6 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 8.2 of 10

Road Noise: 8.2 of 10

The Continental CrossContact UHP is designed to blend sporty summer performance with all-season versatility for SUV owners. It delivers robust dry road capabilities along with respectable wet traction that make it a well-rounded choice. Let’s look at the details:

KEY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

Wet Performance

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.1
  • Wet Traction: 8.3

For a max performance summer tire, the CrossContact UHP puts in a very solid showing in the wet. An 8.1 hydroplaning resistance rating indicates it can effectively disperse standing water. And the 8.3 wet traction score means you can drive with confidence when the roads are slick.

Dry Performance

  • Corner Stability: 8.5
  • Dry Traction: 8.9
  • Steering Response: 8.6

Dry road grip and handling are highlights. The 8.9 dry traction allows hard acceleration out of corners with excellent bite. An 8.5 corner stability rating enables high-speed turns and transitions. Steering response at 8.6 is precise and responsive.

Comfort

  • Ride Quality: 8.2
  • Noise: 8.2

You get a nice balance of performance and comfort with the CrossContact UHP. Ride quality and interior noise levels both rate a very agreeable 8.2 – firm but well-damped over bumps with minimal road noise intrusion.

Tire Life

  • Treadwear: 6.6

While not a class-leading number, a 6.6 treadwear rating is actually fairly typical for a high-performance summer tire built to maximize grip over longevity. But frequent drivers should factor in earlier replacements than some touring tires.

PROS

  • Outstanding dry traction and cornering stability
  • Balanced with high comfort levels
  • Excellent hydroplane resistance in wet conditions

CONS

  • Good but not elite wet traction compared to some rivals
  • Treadlife could be better for high mileage use

Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV

Customer Rating

Overall Rating

6.9 of 10

Wet Weather

7.3 of 10

Winter Weather

N/A

Tread Wear

5.0 of 10

Dry Weather

8.1 of 10

Ride Comfort

7.3 of 10

UTQG

Uniform Tire Quality Grade

UTQG Treadwear Rating: 240

UTQG Traction Rating: AA

UTQG Temperature Rating: A

Mileage Warranty

None

Find The Best Price

Key Performance Metrics

Hydroplaning: 7.1 of 10

Wet Grip: 7.6 of 10


Cornering: 8.1 of 10

Dry Grip: 8.3 of 10

Responsiveness: 8.0 of 10

Mild Snow Grip: N/A

Heavy Snow Grip: N/A

Ice Grip: N/A


Comfort Level: 7.5 of 10

Road Noise: 7.1 of 10

The Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV is a summer tire designed to bring racetrack-inspired dry road performance to your premium SUV. While it excels in grip and handling on dry pavement, it makes some trade-offs in other areas that are important to consider. Let’s dive in:

KEY PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENTS

Wet Performance

  • Hydroplaning Resistance: 7.1
  • Wet Traction: 7.6

The wet ratings are a step behind the category leaders, but not necessarily underwhelming for a max performance summer tire. A 7.1 hydroplaning resistance means you’ll want to exercise some caution when there’s heavy standing water. And the 7.6 wet traction indicates respectable but not exceptional grip around soaked corners.

Dry Performance

  • Corner Stability: 8.1
  • Dry Traction: 8.3
  • Steering Response: 8.0

This is where the Eagle F1 really shows its strengths. Dry traction of 8.3 delivers reassuring straight-line acceleration and braking bite. An 8.1 corner stability rating allows for composed turn-in at speed. While steering feel rates 8.0 – good but not razor-sharp.

Comfort

  • Ride Quality: 7.5
  • Noise: 7.1

You’ll feel more of the road’s imperfections compared to some touring tires, with a 7.5 ride quality score. The 7.1 noise rating also indicates this isn’t the quietest cruiser. But it shouldn’t be punishingly harsh for a max performance tire.

Tire Life

  • Treadwear: 5.0

As is common for summer performance tires designed for exceptional grip, the 5.0 treadwear rating is on the lower side. You’re trading some longevity for race-inspired capabilities. More frequent replacements should be budgeted for high mileage drivers.

PROS

  • Superb dry road grip and handling
  • Precise performance at higher speeds
  • Responsive acceleration and braking

CONS

  • Relatively low treadwear longevity
  • Good but not elite wet traction
  • Stiffer ride compared to touring tires
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.
Hydroplaning Resistance And Wet Traction Are Critical For Safety.

Comparative Analysis

When it comes to selecting the right summer tire for your SUV, the details make all the difference. Both the Continental CrossContact UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV bring capable performance features to the table, but their strengths cater to slightly different driving styles and priorities. Let’s break it down to help you decide which tire might be the perfect fit.

Performance in Wet Conditions

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Hydroplaning Resistance 8.1 7.1
Wet Traction 8.3 7.6

The Continental holds a clear advantage in wet weather performance with scores of 8.1 for hydroplaning resistance and 8.3 for wet traction, compared to 7.1 and 7.6 for the Goodyear. If you frequently encounter heavy rain or prioritize maximum traction in slick conditions, the CrossContact UHP is the safer bet.

Dry Traction and Handling

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Corner Stability 8.5 8.1
Dry Traction 8.9 8.3
Steering Response 8.6 8.0

In the dry, the CrossContact UHP again takes the lead with better ratings across the board – 8.9 dry traction compared to 8.3, along with higher scores for corner stability and steering response. If straight-line acceleration and high-speed confidence are priorities, Continental has the edge.

Comfort and Noise

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Ride Quality 8.2 7.5
Noise 8.2 7.1

The Continental CrossContact UHP provides a more comfortable and quieter ride as well, scoring 8.2 for both ride quality and noise versus 7.5 and 7.1 for the Goodyear. Long highway stints and daily commutes will likely be more pleasant on the Continentals.

Treadwear and Durability

Continental CrossContact UHP Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV
Treadwear 6.6 5.0

This is one area where the Goodyear falls well behind – its abysmal 5.0 treadwear rating means you’ll likely be replacing these tires far more frequently than the Continentals, which rate 6.6. For drivers looking to maximize the lifespan of their tires, the CrossContact UHP is the better value proposition.

OVERALL RECOMMENDATION

  • Choose Continental CrossContact UHP if: You want well-rounded performance that doesn’t sacrifice too much in any one area. The CrossContact UHP provides capable grip in dry and wet conditions, reasonably high comfort levels, and better projected tread life than the Goodyear. It’s a safe all-season option for drivers who want a sporty yet refined experience.
  • Opt for Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV if: You prioritize maximum dry road performance and don’t mind sacrificing some wet traction, ride comfort, and treadwear in exchange for higher dry grip ratings. This tire is best suited for drivers who see mostly dry conditions and really want to unlock their SUV’s sporting potential on the street or track.

The CrossContact UHP emerges as the more versatile pick for mixed driving scenarios. But for a dry-road special with incredible handling chops, the focused nature of the Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV could make it worthwhile for driving enthusiasts despite some trade-offs.

Ultimately, your decision should weigh your priorities in performance, comfort, value, and driving conditions. Both tires have strengths, but understanding how they align with your needs will help ensure you make the right choice.

Other Competitors in the Market

While the Continental CrossContact UHP and Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV stand their ground, other competitors could offer a better fit depending on your driving needs. Here’s a closer look at a few worthy contenders:

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.9 (Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.8, Wet Traction: 8.9)
  • Dry: 9.3 (Corner Stability: 9.3, Dry Traction: 9.4, Steering Response: 9.3)
  • Comfort: 8.9 (Ride Quality: 9.1, Noise: 8.8)
    Treadwear: 7.7

Pros:

  • Exceptional dry traction and stability.
  • Top-notch ride quality with minimal road noise.

Cons:

  • Average treadwear, which means a moderately shorter lifespan.

General Grabber UHP

General Grabber UHP
General Grabber UHP

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.7 (Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.7, Wet Traction: 8.8)
  • Dry: 8.8 (Corner Stability: 8.7, Dry Traction: 9.1, Steering Response: 8.7)
  • Comfort: 7.9 (Ride Quality: 8.2, Noise: 7.6)
    Treadwear: 7.9

Pros:

  • Reliable performance in both wet and dry conditions.
  • Solid traction and handling at an attractive price.

Cons:

  • Comfort rating is lower, particularly due to road noise.

Bridgestone Alenza 001

Bridgestone Alenza 001
Bridgestone Alenza 001

Performance Ratings:

  • Wet: 8.3 (Hydroplaning Resistance: 8.3, Wet Traction: 8.3)
  • Dry: 8.9 (Corner Stability: 8.9, Dry Traction: 9.0, Steering Response: 8.9)
  • Comfort: 8.5 (Ride Quality: 8.5, Noise: 8.4)
    Treadwear: 7.5

Pros:

  • Reliable grip and stability on dry pavement.
  • Comfortable ride, with a focus on reducing noise levels.

Cons:

  • Not as strong in wet conditions, and treadwear could be longer-lasting.

Each of these alternatives has its own set of strengths, catering to different needs:

  • Balanced Value: General Grabber UHP is solid for versatile performance without breaking the bank.
  • Comfort and Stability: Bridgestone Alenza 001 is ideal for smooth road trips where noise reduction is key.
  • Dry Performance Master: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV excels in delivering an unmatched dry grip and ride quality.

Make your choice wisely based on what suits your driving style, budget, and specific needs.

Resources

Below are some links you may find helpful when learning about tires:

Final Thoughts

The Continental CrossContact UHP shines in dry grip, ride quality, and steering response but has a lower treadwear rating. It’s a great pick if you want excellent performance in dry conditions with a smooth, comfortable ride. Meanwhile, the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV offers strong cornering stability and reasonable dry traction at a more attractive price, though it’s not as strong in wet conditions and requires more frequent replacements.

Ultimately, the choice hinges on your driving style and climate. If you value precise handling and a quieter ride, go for the CrossContact UHP. If budget matters more and you’re okay with a little extra road noise, the Eagle F1 Asymmetric SUV might be your answer.

Good luck and happy motoring.



About The Author